The Greatest Show on Earth 在线下载 pdf mobi 2025 epub 电子版

From Publishers Weekly

SignatureReviewed by Jonah LehrerRichard Dawkins begins The Greatest Show on Earth with a short history of his writing career. He explains that all of his previous books have naïvely assumed the fact of evolution, which meant that he never got around to laying out the evidence that it [evolution] is true. This shouldn't be too surprising: science is an edifice of tested assumptions, and just as physicists must assume the truth of gravity before moving on to quantum mechanics, so do biologists depend on the reality of evolution. It's the theory that makes every other theory possible.Yet Dawkins also came to realize that a disturbingly large percentage of the American and British public didn't share his enthusiasm for evolution. In fact, they actively abhorred the idea, since it seemed to contradict the Bible and diminish the role of God. So Dawkins decided to write a book for these history-deniers, in which he would dispassionately demonstrate the truth of evolution beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt.After only a few pages of The Greatest Show on Earth, however, it becomes clear that Dawkins doesn't do dispassionate, and that he's not particularly interested in convincing believers to believe in evolution. He repeatedly compares creationists and Holocaust deniers, which is a peculiar way of reaching out to the other side. Elsewhere, Dawkins calls those who don't subscribe to evolution ignorant, fatuously ignorant and ridiculous. All of which raises the point: who, exactly, is supposed to read this book? Is Dawkins preaching to the choir or trying to convert the uninformed? While The Greatest Show on Earth might fail as a work of persuasive rhetoric—Dawkins is too angry and acerbic to convince his opponents—it succeeds as an encyclopedic summary of evolutionary biology. If Charles Darwin walked into a 21st-century bookstore and wanted to know how his theory had fared, this is the book he should pick up.Dawkins remains a superb translator of complex scientific concepts. It doesn't matter if he's spinning metaphors for the fossil record (like a spy camera in a murder trial) or deftly explaining the method by which scientists measure the genetic difference between distinct species: he has a way of making the drollest details feel like a revelation. Even if one already believes in the survival of the fittest, there is something thrilling about learning that the hoof of a horse is homologous to the fingernail of the human middle finger, or that some dinosaurs had a second brain of ganglion cells in their pelvis, which helped compensate for the tiny brain in their head. As Darwin famously noted, There is grandeur in this view of life. What Dawkins demonstrates is that this view of life isn't just grand: it's also undeniably true. Color illus. (Sept. 29)Jonah Lehrer is the author of How We Decide and Proust Was a Neuroscientist.

Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Bookmarks Magazine

"Like a detective reconstructing a crime" (San Francisco Chronicle), Dawkins amasses a mountain of evidence in this richly illustrated, enormously readable explanation of the theory of evolution. Though Dawkins may have softened his attitude toward those who can reconcile their religious beliefs with evolution, he still harbors great hostility toward its detractors, equating them to Holocaust deniers—a label that riled the New York Times Book Review. Objecting to Dawkins's abrasive dogmatism, many critics felt that the biologist is at his best when he forgets his opponents and focuses on the science. He is indeed a master of explaining complex scientific ideas to nonscientific readers, and though The Greatest Show on Earth may not be his best book, it is a well-written, captivating review of the science behind the theory.

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

Richard Dawkins taught zoology at the University of California at Berkeley and at Oxford University and is now the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford, a position he has held since 1995. Among his previous books are The Ancestor's Tale, The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker, Climbing Mount Improbable, Unweaving the Rainbow, and A Devil's Chaplain. Dawkins lives in Oxford with his wife, the actress and artist Lalla Ward.

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：The Greatest Show on Earth在线阅读

在线听书地址：The Greatest Show on Earth在线收听

在线购买地址：The Greatest Show on Earth在线购买

设想，你是一位讲授罗马史和拉丁语的老师，急于向学生们传授你对古代世界怀有的满腔热情——包括奥维德（Ovid）的挽歌、贺拉斯（Horace）的颂歌、西塞罗（Cicero）的雄辩中展示的强有力的拉丁语语法，布匿战争中的完美战术，尤利乌斯·凯撒（Juius Caesar）的为将之道和后代君王的骄奢淫逸。这将是一项大工程，耗时持久，需要专注和投入。但与此同时，你发现自己宝贵的时间不断地被人侵夺，你班上学生的注意力被分散到了别处——一群不学无术的人（作为拉丁文学者，你会用ignorami这个词称呼他们）在大声嚷嚷。他们有强大的政治力和雄厚的财力作后盾，在迫切地、不遗余力地试图劝服你那些可怜的学生，告诉他们——罗马人不曾存在过，从来没有什么“罗马帝国”。整个世界只存在于“鲜活的记忆之中”。西班牙语、意大利语、法语、葡萄牙语、加泰罗尼亚语、欧西坦语、罗曼什语——所有这些语言及其方言，都是各自独立地、自动发展而来的，它们没有所谓的祖先语言（如拉丁语）。这时候，你就不能再专注于做一名高雅的古典学者或教师了，你被迫分出宝贵的时间和精力，去防守后院，捍卫“罗马的确存在过”这一命题；对抗这种无知偏见的争辩，会令你精疲力竭、无暇他顾。如果争论尚有闲暇的话，你恐怕要大哭一场。

如果我幻想的这个“拉丁语教师”的例子太没有代表性，我再说个更现实的例子。假设，你是一位教近代历史的老师，但你关于“20世纪的欧洲”的讲座，被人联合抵制，遭到了强烈的质问；或遭到了“大屠杀否认者”的打断（他们组织上有条理、经济上充裕、政治上强大）。同我前面虚构的“罗马否认者”不同，“大屠杀否认者”是确实存在的。这些“否认者”非常聒噪，善于混淆视听，惯于作出博学的样子。他们至少受到某一当代强国总统的支持，他们中还至少包括一名罗马天主教的大主教。设想，你作为一名教授欧洲历史的老师，要不断地面对这些好斗之徒，他们要求教师在课堂上讲授“...

全任何给定情况下的任何给定物种，都有一个最佳的安全距离一一介于太冒险或鲁莽的最近距离，和太浮躁或不愿承担风险的最远距离之间。当危险降临时，逃离得太晚的个体，更容易被杀死。不过虽说我们未必会想到，但也有逃离得太早这种事情——太浮躁的个体从来没有享受到一次饱餐，因为在视线里出现危险的第一个征兆时它们就逃离了。我们很容易忽视“过度避险”的危险。

有趣的是，不知道未来的分类学家，是否可能会遗憾地叹息我们这一代人混搅基因组的方式——例如，把北极鱼的“反冻结”基因转到西红柿内，以使它们免于霜冻。一个使水母发荧光的基因，已经被科学家“借用”并插入了马铃薯的基因组，希望当马铃薯需要浇水时，该基因会使它们亮起来。我甚至获悉一个“艺术家”设计了一个由借助水母的基因而发光的狗群组成的“装置”。这种所谓的设计以自命不凡的“艺术”之名，令所谓的“科学”斯文扫地，让我浑身上下都不舒服。

This is a book about the positive evidence that evolution is a fact. It is not intended as an anti-religion book.

My dear Wallace：

I do not think you understand what I mean by 【the non-blending of certain varieties】. It does not refer to fertility. An instance will explain. 【I crossed the Painted Lady and Purple sweet peas, which are very differently coloured varieties, and got, even out of the same pod, both varieties perfect but none intermediate.】 Something of this kind, I should think, must occur at first with your butterflies . . . Though these cases are in appearance so wonderful, I do not know that they are really more so than every female in the world producing distinct male and female offspring.

该男子对他的研究越来越感兴趣，……着迷于这一试验的优雅理论基础……

书籍介绍

From Publishers Weekly

SignatureReviewed by Jonah LehrerRichard Dawkins begins The Greatest Show on Earth with a short history of his writing career. He explains that all of his previous books have naïvely assumed the fact of evolution, which meant that he never got around to laying out the evidence that it [evolution] is true. This shouldn't be too surprising: science is an edifice of tested assumptions, and just as physicists must assume the truth of gravity before moving on to quantum mechanics, so do biologists depend on the reality of evolution. It's the theory that makes every other theory possible.Yet Dawkins also came to realize that a disturbingly large percentage of the American and British public didn't share his enthusiasm for evolution. In fact, they actively abhorred the idea, since it seemed to contradict the Bible and diminish the role of God. So Dawkins decided to write a book for these history-deniers, in which he would dispassionately demonstrate the truth of evolution beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt.After only a few pages of The Greatest Show on Earth, however, it becomes clear that Dawkins doesn't do dispassionate, and that he's not particularly interested in convincing believers to believe in evolution. He repeatedly compares creationists and Holocaust deniers, which is a peculiar way of reaching out to the other side. Elsewhere, Dawkins calls those who don't subscribe to evolution ignorant, fatuously ignorant and ridiculous. All of which raises the point: who, exactly, is supposed to read this book? Is Dawkins preaching to the choir or trying to convert the uninformed? While The Greatest Show on Earth might fail as a work of persuasive rhetoric—Dawkins is too angry and acerbic to convince his opponents—it succeeds as an encyclopedic summary of evolutionary biology. If Charles Darwin walked into a 21st-century bookstore and wanted to know how his theory had fared, this is the book he should pick up.Dawkins remains a superb translator of complex scientific concepts. It doesn't matter if he's spinning metaphors for the fossil record (like a spy camera in a murder trial) or deftly explaining the method by which scientists measure the genetic difference between distinct species: he has a way of making the drollest details feel like a revelation. Even if one already believes in the survival of the fittest, there is something thrilling about learning that the hoof of a horse is homologous to the fingernail of the human middle finger, or that some dinosaurs had a second brain of ganglion cells in their pelvis, which helped compensate for the tiny brain in their head. As Darwin famously noted, There is grandeur in this view of life. What Dawkins demonstrates is that this view of life isn't just grand: it's also undeniably true. Color illus. (Sept. 29)Jonah Lehrer is the author of How We Decide and Proust Was a Neuroscientist.

Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Bookmarks Magazine

"Like a detective reconstructing a crime" (San Francisco Chronicle), Dawkins amasses a mountain of evidence in this richly illustrated, enormously readable explanation of the theory of evolution. Though Dawkins may have softened his attitude toward those who can reconcile their religious beliefs with evolution, he still harbors great hostility toward its detractors, equating them to Holocaust deniers—a label that riled the New York Times Book Review. Objecting to Dawkins's abrasive dogmatism, many critics felt that the biologist is at his best when he forgets his opponents and focuses on the science. He is indeed a master of explaining complex scientific ideas to nonscientific readers, and though The Greatest Show on Earth may not be his best book, it is a well-written, captivating review of the science behind the theory.

• 作者：K. 发布时间：2023-12-05 16:53:55

  期待已久的保险100问第5本，内容同样是干货满满。这本书对年金险的概念、功能、投保做了很详细的介绍，值得一读。

• 作者：锦绣星河 发布时间：2022-09-20 16:37:17

  一般，看过了一本书。

• 作者：莺啼山客犹眠 发布时间：2017-05-09 15:12:31

  才发现我在中文版下面评论了“想看原版”，难怪李掰掰会给我从家里带了原版来。跟他的音乐一样，灵动而富有激情，读来愉悦而刺激，是一个喜欢胡说八道的天才

• 作者：medicine 发布时间：2012-12-01 10:06:46

  愚昧啊…

• 作者：能 发布时间：2023-02-22 06:58:42

  对于横排竖排的行间距非常详细，对于长段和短段的对比。有很多书只是泛泛而谈的说了一些理论，但是不如这本书中间的相关实操。可以说对于正文行间距，这是一本好书。

• 作者：sing 发布时间：2012-03-13 11:46:37

  厄我觉得我不适合看这种书，看着看着就睡着了啊有木有

• 你怀疑过进化论是一个事实吗

  作者：Strawberry 发布时间：2011-11-10 14:43:15

  在无神论的教育下长大的我们也许听到这个数字会感到惊讶：原来美国仍有超过40%的人相信地球上的生物包括人类是上帝创造，而达尔文的进化论根本是无稽之谈！

  也许你会嘲笑这些愚昧的上帝的子民。换个角度，你是否想过我们毫无保留的接受了进化论，正像我们接受了很多普世理论和课本里的标准答案一样。我们也应该问一问真的是这样的吗？为什么是这样的？如果不是这样那会是怎样的呢？

  我正是这样一个丝毫没有怀疑过进化论的人。我抱着只是深入了解一下达尔文的著名理论的心态开始阅读此书。事实上这本书并不那么容易读，它不是一本简单的科普读物，而是一篇冗长的学术论文。作者从各个角度论证进化论，大量跨学科的分析，内容涉及考古学，物理学，化学，胚胎学，数学模型。。。读者真是少一点耐心和认真求证的态度都不行。因此在我看来它并不是一本好的入门读物。但如果你想了解一下一个科学家和研究学者是怎样研究并阐述一个理论的话这是一个很好范例。如果你正准备读研究院，那么这本书也许能激发你写一篇对的起自己对得起业界的论文。

  介于我过往看书都是以消遣为主，虽然我坚持读完全书，有些感想，记得个别的有趣的例子，但可以真正吸收理解的部分却不尽人意。如果真的要有更多收获，不妨边读边做笔记。读这类书籍，更像学习的过程而非消遣。当然，我相信如果你真的想研究生物学或进化论，一本书是远远不够的。

• 辉格：作为一项历史事实的进化——评道金斯《地球上最伟大的表演》

  作者：whig 发布时间：2013-11-12 22:43:00

  作为一项历史事实的进化——评道金斯《地球上最伟大的表演》

  辉格

  2013年5月5日

  作为现代进化理论和新达尔文主义最著名的通俗阐释者和辩护者，道金斯多年来致力于向公众解释进化论；和他过去出版的多部通俗作品一样，这仍是一本为进化论辩护的书，不同的是，之前的作品更像是在为对进化理论有兴趣的人答疑解惑，而这本则更富战斗性，它旨在为那些相信进化论的人在面对种种质疑（尤其是来自特创论者的）时，提供回击所需的弹药。

  另一个区别是，此前的作品，如1986年的《盲眼钟表匠》和1996年的《攀登不可能之山》（Climbing Mount Improbable），多侧重于说明作为一种理论模型的进化机制，如何可能创造出那些被怀疑者认为它不可能导致的复杂精妙结构（比如眼睛），而本书则旨在通过展示各方面证据说服人们相信，作为一项事实的生物进化史，确曾在地球上发生过。

  在第一章，道金斯首先指出，进化论既是一种理论，也是一项事实；确实，对进化论所涉及的理论模型和历史事实作出明确区分是重要的，因为历来有许多质疑者说进化论只是一种套套逻辑，甚至像卡尔·波普和伊姆雷·拉卡托斯这样的著名科学哲学家，也曾在多个场合宣称进化论是不可检验、无法证伪的，因而不是科学理论。

  现代进化论的另一位著名捍卫者、哲学家丹尼尔·丹内特曾在《达尔文的危险观念》（Darwin's Dangerous Idea）里指出，进化论的核心思想可以抽象为一种从一组信息获得另一组信息的算法，它可以是介质无关的，也不蕴含任何事实，因而按波普的标准，确实算不上科学理论。

  然而，进化学说不只包含了这一算法，更将该算法运用于地球上的生物，从而与经验世界联系了起来；这一联系让进化学说转变成了这样的论断：地球现生生物是在其数十亿年地质史上，经由进化机制，从一个共同祖先演变而来。显然，该论断包含了很强的事实判断，完全可以接受检验。

  此后各章，作者从不同方面列举了支持进化学说、或该学说所蕴含而实际上也被观察到了的经验事实；重要的是，离开进化论，这些事实将变得不可思议、无法理解和难以置信；在道金斯看来，对于任何正视这些事实并在智力上保持诚实的人，接受进化论将成为无法抗拒的选择。这些事实有（以下编号对应章序）：

  2）家养动植物的驯化历史演示了与自然选择原理相同的人工选择机制，而后者的效果在几十数百年中即可有显著表现，因而可以从个体经验中得到认知，这就让自然选择机制更易于被理解和接受；对那些有着“进化论听起来不错，可我想象不出在现实中进化会如何发生”之类疑问的人，驯化是个很好的演示；

  3）传粉昆虫与被传粉植物之间、捕食者与被捕食者之间、雌性对雄性，存在着类似的选择机制，这几对关系中的双方，可以视为是在相互驯化；离开这些选择机制，这些物种的许多特性将难以理解；

  4）多项独立的年代测定技术——年轮、放射性时钟，还有第十章介绍的分子钟等——将进化史在时间序列上与地质史关联了起来，从而让进化理论对物种分化史各关键节点和各种生物形态出现先后的推断，可以得到生物考古的检验，而迄今为止的化石和年代证据都与上述推断相容，“没有出现哪怕一件”与进化理论相悖的化石；

  5）某些进化过程甚至可以在短短数十年内产生可观察到的显著效果，从而可以在个人生活经验中得到识别，比如随环境污染程度而变化的蛾子颜色，新近入侵某孤岛的蜥蜴的性状变化，大肠杆菌在实验室繁育条件下产生了对柠檬酸盐的利用能力，等等；

  6）自达尔文以来，无论在现生生物还是在化石中，都已发现了大量前所未知的“中间形态”，而日益深入的解剖学和胚胎学研究也揭示了更多的中间形态，连接各种结构与特性各发展阶段的进化链条，在今天比以往任何时候都得到了更完整的描绘，并且正变得越来越充实；当然，因为化石记录的非完备性，每个中间形态的发现总是增加而非减少了有待发现的中间形态，但所谓“缺环”并不是进化论的负面证据；

  7）过去一个世纪，人类进化链条各环节的化石证据也被不断发现，如今该链条已变得相当充实；

  8）胚胎发育过程展示了，在恰当配方的指导下，从单个细胞到高度复杂精密的多细胞生命体的演变过程，可以在常规条件下、在很短时间内完成，问题只是如何寻找适当配方，而进化机制正是一种用来寻找配方的大规模并行搜索算法；

  9）动物的地理分布表现出强烈的地方性，形成特征鲜明的动物区系（fauna）——比如马达加斯加的狐猴类，澳洲的有袋类，美洲的新大陆猴和贫齿目，非洲大湖的慈鲷科鱼类——，区系之间存在着占据相似生态位、功能和形态上趋同、但解剖结构上却迥异的“等位物种”，而区系内动物则表现出更多解剖结构上的相似性，这一现象离开进化论便无从解释，若放进“创世纪原教旨主义者”所信奉的“诺亚理论”中，更将显得荒诞无比；

  10）比较解剖学发现，不同物种在功能和形态上截然不同的器官，常常是同胚的（homeomorphic），即，一个原型器官常被改造而用于执行不同功能，假如生物是由理性设计的，那么这位设计师似乎总是过于迂腐的坚守同胚性，而拒绝脱离同胚关系而在物种间移用现成的设计元素，即便这么做让设计工作变得困难且高度迂回，结果也往往很糟糕；

  11）从工程设计角度看，假如生物果真是设计的，那么众多事实表明，这位设计师常表现的非常拙劣甚至不可理喻，人类身上便有不少例子：眼睛的盲点，绕道而行的喉返神经和输精管，无用而容易发炎的阑尾；另外像穴居动物完全丧失功能的眼睛，离开进化解释则更显得荒诞无稽；

  12）假如生物果真是设计的，那么设计师好像十分阴暗变态，他为相互争斗的双方——捕食与被捕食者、寄生与被寄生者、性追求与被追求者，甚至亲子冲突中的孕妇与胎儿——装备了高超精妙、残忍凶狠、无所不用其极的攻击、猎杀、欺骗和剥削手段，似乎他决意要让生活充斥着痛苦、残忍、阴谋和罪恶，既如此，他何以仍被视为“仁慈的造物主”？

  这份清单本身是极具说服力的，然而这种说服力要在具体的听众头脑里产生作用，仍需要后者打开自己的理性窗户，将自己的鸵鸟头从厚厚的成见沙土中抬起来，正视无处不在的证据；可是依我看，对于那些迄今不愿放弃特创论、而宁愿相信宇宙历史不超过一万年的人来说，这样的要求太高了，他们要么原本就不具备冷静听取和辨别对立证据的理性能力，要么早已丧失了运用理性的意志和勇气。

  离开由信仰、成见和习惯所营造的安乐窝，凭借个人理性直面世界和生活，是需要些勇气的，难以奢望所有人在所有时候都拥有它；而对于一位科学作者，将假想对话者设定为那些不能或拒绝运用理性的人，或许只会降低自己的叙述水准，这也是我对本书的不满所在，在道金斯的诸多作品中，这是主题最分散、叙述最不集中连贯的一本，当然，假如你有兴趣与特创论者舌战一番，它确实提供了一个齐全而方便的弹药库。