唐宋花间廿四家词赏析 在线下载 pdf mobi 2025 epub 电子版

《唐宋花间二十四家词赏析》，本书收录《花间集》十八家；温庭筠《金荃词》七十首、皇甫松《檀栾子词》二十二首等。共收词作一千二百三十二首。

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：唐宋花间廿四家词赏析在线阅读

在线听书地址：唐宋花间廿四家词赏析在线收听

在线购买地址：唐宋花间廿四家词赏析在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

《唐宋花间二十四家词赏析》，本书收录《花间集》十八家；温庭筠《金荃词》七十首、皇甫松《檀栾子词》二十二首等。共收词作一千二百三十二首。

• 作者：冷战老手 发布时间：2017-09-19 15:50:01

  资深时政记者居然写出这么肤浅平庸之作，像宣传册子。

• 作者：Mr魂梦 发布时间：2021-09-03 09:21:23

  很不错的一本书，美中不足的是有些不好理解的词语该注释的地方没有注释，反而其他的一眼就能明了的地方注释的挺详细。总而言之，该书主要在于花间词的解析，并不深入探讨，但是值得一看

• 作者：在路上 发布时间：2016-03-14 23:12:09

  比喻形象入里，内容浅显易懂，适合入门看看！

• 作者：龙小姐 发布时间：2021-04-11 01:07:59

  可能是时间太紧迫，并未记录下太多南怀瑾想要留下的东西，所以很多作者自己其他的事儿充数了，还借别人口夸了自己好几次，不知道南师知道自己的传记最后这成了这样会怎么想。

• 作者：nothing传叔 发布时间：2012-09-26 22:20:11

  该书附录2《无国界医生的人道运动大事纪要》简直就是七十年代以来的全球动乱史的简明提纲啊。。。

• 作者：韧勉 发布时间：2018-01-15 20:52:36

  属于文献结集的类书吗，蛮有意思的，关于酒的制作，类型的资料书。

• DNA Evidence and Forensic Science reading notes

  作者：Fanchen 发布时间：2011-11-15 13:08:44

          ✓

  Anthropometry

          ✓

  ✓

  p5: Anthropometry. Developed by Alphonse Bertillon (a French criminologist) in the late 1870s, this method, though largely replaced by fingerprint analysis now, is still widely used in anthropology to determine the identity of human remains.

          ✓

  p6: Bertillonage = Bertillon's system of using precise terminology to determine a human body's characters. He went as meticulously as possible in measuring human bodies, such as characterizing a person's ear into more than 50 categories or designing extremely sophisticated and well-controlled methods to measure the length of a foot.

          ✓

  p8: Bertillonage is like the taxonomy of human beings.

          ✓

  p9: The decline of Bertillonage was due to its sophistication and people from other countries being unable or unwilling to follow Bertillon's original requirements. Another reason, of course, was the rise of the much simpler analysis of fingerprints.

          ✓

  Fingerprint

          ✓

  p11: I don't know of how the ancient Chinese interpreted the fingerprint ink, but I kinda feel that the fingerprint mark is more of an authorization that the person to which the mark belongs agree with whatever the document states. The fingerprint mark is a signature. And since signature can be forged, so can fingerprint mark. My point here is the use of fingerprint to distinguish people developed in China is not for IDENTIFYING individuals but for AUTHORIZATION. Thus, the Chinese actually have never figured out how to compare fingerprints and determine whether they are identical or not, despite the fact that they might have noticed the potential application of fingerprints long time ago.

          ✓

  Sir William Herschel, by mid-19th century, developed the modern use of fingerprints in criminology during his work in India. Dr Henry Faulds pushed the study even further around the same time in Japan and published a paper (the first scientific paper in the use of fingerprints for identification purposes) in Nature. Yet, the later drama between the two for who discovered the value of fingerprints was kind of hilarious. Francis Galton wrote the first classics in the field: Finger Prints, in 1892 (however, this man did so for eugenic purpose).

          ✓

  The fingerprint system for English-speaking countries (developed by Sir Edward Henry) is slightly different from that for Spanish-speaking countries (developed by Juan Vucetich)

          ✓

  p16: Two basic assumptions of fingerprint: 1. Fingerprint develops before a person is born, lasts forever, and is almost impossible to alter using any means; 2. each individual has a unique fingerprint pattern.

          ✓

  p19: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (what constitutes scientific evidence? What kind of science is admissible?)

          ✓

  p20: United States v. Bryon Mitchell (first challenge to the admissibility of fingerprint evidence)

          ✓

  p21: Though there are still controversies surrounding the validity of traditional fingerprint analysis and the new-comer, namely the DNA fingerprinting, has become highly accurate, it is still one of the most convenient method in terms of individual identification.

          ✓

  Ballistic Fingerprint

          ✓

  p27: Indeed, the problem with the size of the database is a huge concern for ballistic fingerprinting. Perhaps what is needed is to digitalize the information contained in the markings of the bullet and the rifling of the gun that fires the bullet. If computerized, to set up a library for all the ballistic weapons currently available through legal means in the US is not impossible. I think people should try to further the issue this way, just as the digitalization of real fingerprints. And at the meantime, it might be a good idea to suspend the traditional stockpile of weapons.

          ✓

  Polygraph (lie detection)

          ✓

  p28: The hot iron-bar test of lying is totally absurd, whereas the dry rice (or bread, or cheese) chewing test does have a tiny little sanity in it, since people tend to secrete less saliva when they are until strong emotional response, such as lying in this particular case.

          ✓

  p29: Later during the Renaissance was pulse rate recognized as a good way to detect subterfuge. Yet, full application of this method was not possible until the techniques for measuring pulse rate and respiration were available in the 19th century.

          ✓

  p31: The four elements in modern polygraph: blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration, and galvanic skin response (GSR: the change of skin electrical conductivity).

          ✓

  p32: It is worth pointing out over and over again that a polygraph is not necessarily a lie-detecting machine, yet it is only a piece of equipment that detects multiple physiological changes of human body when the person is subject to different emotional state, such as lying. However, the emotional state could also include nervousness, fright, etc.

          ✓

  p35: The Daubert case and the Frye case are again mentioned here.

          ✓

  p35: Refer to the Scheffer case to know that polygraph is still not accepted in American jurisdiction.

          ✓

  p37: The scientific validity of polygraph (and also the underlying hypothesis that lying can be correlated with measurable physiological responses) is not strong. Besides, two official reports suggested that the accuracy of detecting lies with polygraph was far from perfection. Yet, it is still the best method currently available in lie-detecting business.

          ✓

  p39: The EPPA regulation prohibits many fields of employment from using polygraph before employment. Yet, many federal- or legal-related departments are exempted from the regulation, and the use of polygraph pre-employment, its inaccuracy and lack of scientific support notwithstanding, is widespread. In fact, I feel that polygraph has somehow transcended its role as a simple machine of measurement, but become a symbol of authority that forces the truth out of some people. Just as stated in the book, many a time people's belief in the power of polygraph makes them reveal the truth before the test is even applied. In this sense, the continuation of polygraph test might not be a bad idea at all. The technique is indeed too weak to be accepted as legal evidence, yet it might help investigators or employers to find clues and inspirations that are otherwise unattainable.

          ✓

  DNA Typing

          ✓

  p40: British geneticist Alec Jeffreys discovered the application of DNA typing in forensic use.

          ✓

  p43: The Andrew's case in 1987 (Tommy Lee Andrews was convicted a rape crime and the verdict was upheld in higher district court of appeals thanks to DNA evidence) is the first one in the US that depends on DNA evidence.

          ✓

  p44: People vs. Castro, the one very important case in DNA typing. It reveals that 1. DNA typing is scientifically sound; and 2. the biggest problem of such evidence arises from mistreatment of the DNA sample and human error in analysis.

          ✓

  p48: Here comes the social-political problem concerning DNA database: should we obtain the DNA information from "the entire criminal population" even if the individuals are not subject to any prosecution? The question could be modified into: does the government have such right as to obtain our very private DNA information by claiming that this could facilitate the search of justice? Would this eventually lead to a totalitarianism, that the government knows not only who we are but wherever we go and whatever we do? In fact, a more practical problem at that time was there were simply too many DNA samples to be typed or to be acquired from criminals. It is good practice that the expansion of DNA database was not approved back in the 90s, yet perhaps such idea would come out again in the future, considering the fact that we have already entered the fourth generation of DNA sequencer.

          ✓

  p49: The first case in US that a wrongly convicted person was exonerated due to DNA evidence: the release of Gary Dotson in 1989.

          ✓

  p56: The difference between the Frye standard and the Rule 702 is that the former requires scientific evidence to be firstly "generally accepted" within the field, while the latter only requires it to be scientifically sound even if the science of the evidence has not been largely accepted by the scientific community. This change is quite important, because it allows the use of new techniques in providing evidence, which might give rise to advancement in forensic science.

          ✓

  p102: Locard's Exchange Principle. The principle states that a criminal will ALWAYS leave some traces behind him, either his fingerprints, footprints, hair, fiber, or something else.

          ✓

  p131: Book, article, report, website list concerning general information of forensic science.

          ✓

  p169: Book, article, report, website list concerning DNA Typing.

          ✓

  p226: A clear replay of the Daubert case judgement. The key difference between the Daubert and the Fyre cases is that the latter requires "general acceptance" of the specific expert evidence, while the former requires close examination of the principles and methods which construct or produce such evidence. In fact, general acceptance is also needed in the Daubert rule, yet it is for the methods not the evidence itself. The logic behind the Daubert rule is that, as long as the principles and methods are scientifically sound, peer reviewed, generally accepted, and the error rates of which available, the conclusions generated by them can be admissible as good evidence. This essentially allows new techniques to be used in court, without fearing that its novelty would prevent its potential capabilities in clarifying doubts.

• 如何在满目琳琅之中，练就一双“火眼金睛”

  作者：缓缓有点慢 发布时间：2018-08-22 15:43:21

  当今社会，经济水平和科技生产力都在飞速发展，人们对于生活和物质的追求也与日俱增，珠宝玉石已经不再是只为收藏所用，寻常百姓家也比比皆是。那么，在这么琳琅满目的宝石美玉中，我们该如何选择？又应怎样辨别真伪好坏？

  师俊超

  老师的这本

  《一眼辨真伪》

  ，便为我们带来了实质性的鉴别指导。教会我们的不仅仅是辨别真伪，包括各种玉石器物的品级好坏，即使是一个小菜鸟，相信在读完这本书之后，也会在宝石鉴别方面大有长进。

  师俊超老师在业界大有名望，是一位资深的珠宝玉石鉴定师、艺术品鉴定师、艺术品评估师，他十几年精益求精的探索，才得来这本经验之书。《一眼辨真伪》不仅图文结合，采用了大量的鉴别对比等实物照片，让人一目了然，而且书本纸质精良，其中有非常多的案例讲解分析，将大量的实际所遇到的经验和鉴别方面的理论知识完美结合，是一本非常值得学习和收藏的好书。

  

  “人养玉一时，玉养人一生。”——和田玉

  中国在玉石方面的文化源远流长，从古至今，爱玉之人与日俱增，而真正懂玉之人，却寥寥无几。玉石文化历经数千年的沉淀和传承，它的价值也愈加难以估量。而玉中精品当属和田，我们所理解所听说的和田玉，其实并不准确。市面上常见的和田玉多产自我过新疆、青海、辽宁（岫岩）、台湾花莲、以及国外的俄罗斯、加拿大、韩国、巴基斯坦等国家和地区，这些地区出产的和田玉被称作“广义和田玉”和“泛和田玉”，而狭义上的和田玉，专指我过新疆产出的和田玉。师俊超老师在和田玉部分，详细介绍了和田玉中精品和低品质的鉴别，以及想要入手和田玉时，我们需要考虑的诸多因素和挑选方法。

  

  各种玉石仿籽料的鉴别

  “ 莎草江汀漫晚潮，翠华香扑水光遥。”——翡翠

  翠玉之美，有种由眼及心的通透之感。 翡翠虽然不如和田玉的历史那么悠久，但却独树一帜的成为恒古不变的璀璨之物，历朝历代，一件一件翡翠演绎了诸多风情，赞美翡翠的诗句也句句触动心灵！ 翡翠虽然冠之以“翠”之名，实则颜色多种多样，灿烂炫目，而其中的红、绿、紫、白、黄这五种颜色，被人们更加喜爱，更是赋予了福、禄、寿、喜、财五种买号的寓意。翡翠的水头、鉴别、保养等诸多知识，也在本书中一一详细介绍。

  

  独山玉、葡萄石和冰种翡翠的鉴别

  “ 莫许杯深琥珀浓，未成沉醉意先融。”——琥珀蜜蜡

  琥珀在中国的受喜爱程度是难以想象的，大概跟它曾经象征着财富和地位有很大关系。琥珀产自天然，大自然鬼斧神工，以神奇之手， 造就了这让人惊叹的 “活色生香”。琥珀和其他珍宝最大的区别，大概在于它的体内曾有过生命的体征，风化千年后，自带一种灵气，它用一种寂静沉睡的姿态，不经意间喷发出勃然生机。阔别曾经怀中生命的琥珀，带着温润如玉的温度，给人不一样的恬静。琥珀的来历、挑选、鉴别和养护等技能，也被光大热爱琥珀蜜蜡之人所迫切需要。

  “ 内府殷红玛瑙盘，婕妤传诏才人索。”——南红

  南红玛瑙带着吉祥之意，它的火红外表，如日出东升一般显示着勃勃生机。中国人热爱红色，红色象征着吉祥如意，是人们精神的一种寄托。不仅在民间深受喜爱，于宫廷之中也被视为珍品。现如今，各个博物馆的馆藏之中也有诸多南红物件，价值连城，不难看出，历朝历代中，宫廷贵族对于南红玛瑙的重视程度。玉有等级之分，南红也不例外，精品和普品之间千差万别，如何鉴别和挑选变成了重中之重。

  “地远松石古，风扬弦管清。”——绿松石

  绿松石的历史可谓让人惊叹，上溯到新时期时代，已经为人们所用。而诸多历史人物中，也有很多对绿松石赞赏有加的事迹。绿松石因其“形似松球，色近松绿”而得名，可谓石如其名。它的色泽淡雅清新，作为首饰佩戴或者装饰于衣着鞋帽乃至武器佩刀之上，都有一种独特的风姿。绿松石与和田玉、岫岩玉、独山玉被称作“中国四大名玉”，足以见得它的地位之高，价值之重。绿松石开采量有限，加工精品的出成率较低，导致假货频出。所以更加需要学好鉴别知识，擦亮双眼，去寻觅珍品。

  “色相如天,或复金屑散乱,光辉灿烂,若众星丽于天也。”——青金石

  青金石是佛教七宝之一，青金石之青，庄重而威严，它寓意祥瑞，在古今中外都是非常贵重的珍宝。青金石的蓝色自带一种贵气而威严的气场，非常的大气典雅，故多用于古代大典之上，具有极高的收藏价值。青金石用途广泛，不仅可以当做珠宝首饰点缀，还可做成各种摆件、鼻烟壶等玩物，更是一种珍贵的绘画原料，磨石成粉，绘于纸上，其色泽令人惊叹。喜爱青金石之人，便可根据师俊超老师的这本《一眼辨真伪》学习一二了。

  

  青金石的鉴别

  方法是死的，经验是活的。多多学习和观察，将学到的鉴赏知识和技能运用到实际应用中去，相信终有一日，将练就一双“火眼金睛”，面对纷呈炫目的玉石珠宝不在迷茫无措，而是胸有成竹的一眼辨真伪！