现代情报学理论 在线下载 pdf mobi 2025 epub 电子版

暂无相关简介，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：现代情报学理论在线阅读

在线听书地址：现代情报学理论在线收听

在线购买地址：现代情报学理论在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

暂无其它内容！

• 作者：李果子米 发布时间：2019-04-05 00:52:26

  情报学理论的教材，不建议初学者看

• 作者：uniqFish 发布时间：2019-11-06 17:33:00

  没打算去考个PMP，看本书是为了学习了解系统化、规范化、标准化的PMBOK项目管理。看到了不少有实践但不知道怎么归纳的东西，也看到了很多接触不到的内容，还看到了一些与实际会脱离的内容。

  本书基于考试参考书，所以一半是试题，一半是内容，内容基本上也是以罗列为主，没有什么案例、举例、说明什么的。看看还是挺好的，理论结合实际。对于那种不现实的，基本就是停留在书面的，那就掠过吧。

• 作者：当尼采哭泣 发布时间：2022-10-15 03:30:50

  弗洛伊德的梦的解析已经够胡扯了，这本在梦的解析之上继续胡扯

• 作者：笛子_ld 发布时间：2016-06-28 19:12:30

  四星給父後七日，書裡其他的內容實在一般

• 作者：kraken 发布时间：2019-01-10 11:16:39

  又是新的一年，我学会说“不”了吗

• 作者：syusyu 发布时间：2021-06-14 14:52:55

  应该是我国最早研究国家公园的团队多年积累的成果集，系统、全面地讲解了我国自然保护地相关的体制机制、关键议题、国内外案例、社区相关问题以及多种专项前沿课题，是国家公园和自然保护地领域的必读书目。

• 很不错的书

  作者：lefeu 发布时间：2014-10-07 23:43:30

  如果喜欢百家讲坛，也喜欢钱文忠老师的授课，那么这本书一定是要有的了。

  之所以看这本书一方面是因为钱文忠老师的名气，一方面是因为出于对传统文化的喜爱。读完本书，觉得很值。一方面了解到古人对待学习，为人处世的一些大道理，另外一方面则是温习了我国从古至明朝的历史，当然主要是大历史事件。之前是学习理科的，所以对历史掌握得不是很好，前后有的东西也记不清了，正好这书帮我补习补习。当然如果想了解更详细的历史情况，这本书远远不够。

  最大的收获是，记住了“人之初性本善”这六个字后面的几句。

  最后，这本书比起看百家讲坛，能节约不少时间

• creativity book review

  作者：西瓜＞芝麻 发布时间：2017-10-06 02:26:56

  Dr. Sawyer is an expert in the field of innovation, collaboration, and learning sciences. With rich experience of public speaking, training, and working with diverse institutions, he passionately promotes the idea that innovative potential is prevalent in everyday settings and everyone’s life. In his 2013 book

  Zig zag: The surprising path to greater creativity

  , Dr. Sawyer brings up his model of creative process in 8 zigzag steps, namely Ask, Learn, Look, Play, Think, Fuse, Choose, and Make. This model is quite expressive because its comprehensive coverage and systematic process, with the consideration of both the cognitive and sociocultural view of learning. Based on these concrete steps, he makes the strong and clear argument that creativity is not an unpredictable strike on a few geniuses, but is a manageable process for everyone given proper practices of certain cognitions and behaviors.

  This is the first book I read about creativity. I find it quite eye-opening and exciting, with all the practical guidelines and strategies that can be readily applied in daily life. One important take-away is the argument that creativity can be cultivated if you wish, rather than being passively endowed with. More importantly, it inspires me to look at my life differently with a more playful and active mood.

  In each chapter around one step, Dr. Sawyer successfully discusses the significance, anecdotes and examples (either success or failure cases in creativity), the association with other steps, as well as some practical exercises. Another strength is the strong support of empirical research findings from the fields such as business, music, and psychology. They are sprinkled in the book and make the argument more convincing than propagandist.

  While reading this book, I followed the author’s suggestion to ponder some creativity challenges at hand. And I actually multitasked, or in Dr. Sawyer’s words “Cook on All Burners” (p. 162), which is to shift among several ongoing projects at a time and open the window for fusing ideas. It is really an exciting and enjoyable experience to witness my creativity grow. In this way, not only the reading becomes more relevant to me, but also changes the way I process information from passive reception to active association, idea generation, and evaluation. As I learnt from my Instructional Strategies class, another possible way to engage in reading and reflecting on this book is to rank top three favorite strategies from each of these eight steps.

  As this is my first read in the psychology of creativity, it’s quite refreshing for me to bump into so many good ideas. However, for those who have been in creative professions for a while, such as commercial designers, teachers, businessmen, and artists, the content may not be very surprising. Moreover, even though the linking of his 8 main elements is somewhat new, the wording of “zig zag” may be misleading. I am left the impression that the creative process is more like an interacted blending of various cognitions and behaviors, rather than haphazardly bouncing around several self-contained entities or steps. For example, one can simultaneously ask and learn, play and make, look and fuse, etc.; all can intertwine and do not extinguish from each other neatly. Admittedly, I buy into Sawyer’s proposition that creative process is seldom a straightforward or smooth path from one stop to another once and for all, but more often a jumpy and back-and-forth iteration and evolution. Nevertheless, the word “zig zag” does not depict the creative process as satisfactorily as the knitted diagram he uses on page 216.

  Although the idea that creativity has no finite termination makes sense, it sounds depressing to people like me, who just want to close the task at hand and move on in life. Surely, the influence of previous project must be there and probably blends into future production, but one cannot always afford the luxury to pursue a perfect Neverland. How to balance ever perfection and efficiency is a question to be answered. In this case, this argument may not be appealing for those whose work has clear boundaries and progressions.

  Another thing I want to touch upon is one of the strategies in “Ask” section – “Find the Bug”. Debugging is a very powerful locomotive of problem solving and innovation. In one example (p. 30), instead of being bugged by cluttered bathroom cabinet every day, installing a lazy Susan inside to spin makes the life all the more delightful and easy. However, I am a little concerned about the use of free attacks on flaws and its overgeneralization to other scenarios outside creative asking. In that case, people may be more motivated to start the creative process, yet at the potential cost of habitual malign complaints or nitpicking, and neglect the healing power of positive thinking and being grateful for what we have.

  Personally speaking, what I benefit most from his book is the awareness to ask good questions and the openness towards interminable evolvement of ever better ideas. I used to have the simplified assumption that one should find one key question and mostly direct stamina to the problem-solving rather than problem forming. But looking back, many bad solutions did derive from bad questions in the first place, like in the case of early version of Starbucks (p. 20). Also I have the tendency to see tasks more as obstacles to overcome, hurdles to jump over, and enemies to finish off, rather than chances to learn, to connect, and to grow. This book makes possible an optimistic perspective and fun-loving mindset in my life.

  With increased attention and acceptance of creativity, it’s worth living to see that, in the near future, creativity would become a basic element implanted in many more curriculums and training programs as a way to foster well-being and economic vigor. Would creativity have a similar increase as intelligence scores (i.e., Flynn effect)? Or would it be the case that collective creativity experience boost cancels the inflation out, and makes it harder for individuals to become creative?